G.3 Statistical testing of Performance Requirements with throughput
36.521-13GPPEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA)Part 1: Conformance testingRadio transmission and receptionRelease 17TSUser Equipment (UE) conformance specification
G.3.1 General
The test of receiver performance characteristics is two fold.
1. A signal or a combination of signals is offered to the RX port(s) of the receiver.
2. The ability of the receiver to demodulate /decode this signal is verified by measuring the throughput.
In (2) is the statistical aspect of the test and is treated here.
The minimum requirement for all receiver performance tests is either 70% or 30% of the maximum throughput.
All receiver performance tests are performed in fading conditions. In addition to the statistical considerations, this requires the definition of a minimum test time.
G.3.2 Mapping throughput to error ratio
G.2.2 applies
G.3.3 Design of the test
The test is defined by the following design principles (see clause G.x, Theory….):
1. The standard concept is applied. (not the early decision concept)
2. A second limit is introduced: The second limit is different, whether 30% or 70% throughput is tested.
3. To decide the test pass:
Supplier risk is applied based on the Bad DUT quality
To decide the test fail:
Customer Risk is applied based on the specified DUT quality
The test is defined by the following parameters:
1a) Limit Error Ratio = 0.3 (in case 70% Throughput is tested) or
1b) Limit Throughput = 0.3 (in case 30% Throughput is tested)
2a) Bad DUT factor M=1.378 (selectivity)
2b) Bad DUT factor m=0.692 (selectivity)
justification see: TS 34.121 Clause F.6.3.3
3) Confidence level CL = 95% (for specified DUT and Bad DUT-quality)
G.3.4 Pass Fail limit
Testing Throughput = 30%, then the test limit is
Number of successes (ACK) / number of samples ≥ 59 / 233
Testing Throughput = 70% then the test limit is
Number of fails (NACK and statDTX) / number of samples ≤ 66 / 184
We have to distinguish 3 cases:
a) The duration for the number of samples (233 or 184) is greater than the minimum test time:
Then the number of samples (233 or 184) is predefined and the decision is done according to the number of events (59 successes or 66 fails)
b) Since subframe 0 and 5 contain less bits than the remaining subframes, it is allowed to predefine a number of samples contained in an integer number of frames. In this case test-limit-ratio applies.
c) The minimum test time is greater than the duration for the number of samples:
The minimum test time is predefined and the decision is done comparing the measured ratio at that instant against the test-limit-ratio.
NOTE: The test time for most of the tests is governed by the Minimum Test Time
G.3.5 Minimum Test time
If a pass fail decision in G.3.4 can be achieved earlier than the minimum test time, then the test shall not be decided, but continued until the minimum test time is elapsed.
The tables below contain the minimum number of subframes for FDD and TDD.
By simulations the minimum number of active subframes (carrying DL payload) was derived (MNAS),
then adding inactive subframes to the active ones (e.g. subframe 5 contains no DL payload. For TDD additional subframes contain no DL payload)
then rounding up to full thousand and
then adding a bias of 1000 (BMNSF).
Simulation method to derive minimum test time:
With a level, corresponding a throughput at the test limit (here 30% or 70% of the max. throughput) the preliminary throughput versus time converges towards the final throughput. The allowance of ± 0.2 dB around the above mentioned level is predefined by RAN5 to find the minimum test time. The allowance of ±0.2 dB maps through the function “final throughput versus level” into a throughput corridor. The minimum test time is achieved when the preliminary throughput escapes the corridor the last time. The two functions “final throughput versus level” and “preliminary throughput versus time” are simulation results, which are done individual for each demodulation scenario. HST-scenarios and scenarios with MNAS ≥ 50000 are derived differently.
Figure G.3.5-1: Simulation method to derive minimum test time
Table G.3.5-1: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single Antenna Port Performance
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario plain text: RMC (Bandwidth, allocated RBs, modulation, coding) Antenna (configuration, correlation) Propagation condition, Doppler [additional parameters, if applicable] (info only) |
Minimum Number of Active Subframes (MNAS) to reach the corridor (Simulation, info only) |
Minimum Number of Subframes (MNS) to reach the corridor (MNS = active and inactive subframes) (Calculation, info only) |
Biased Minimum Number of SubFrames (BMNSF) BMNSF=
(mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.2 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
38 764 |
43 072 |
77 528 |
45 000 |
79 000 |
|
2 |
R.2 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
2 764 |
3 072 |
5 528 |
5 000 |
7 000 |
|
3 |
R.2 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2 Low) ETU,300 |
1 424 |
1 583 |
2 848 |
3 000 |
4 000 |
|
4 |
R.2 (10 MHz , full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2) HST |
28 800 |
NA |
NA |
28 800 |
57 600 |
|
5 |
R.4 (1.4 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
44 354 |
49 283 |
147 847 |
51 000 |
149 000 |
|
6 |
R.3 (10 MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
39 020 |
43 356 |
78 040 |
45 000 |
80 000 |
|
R.3-1 (5 MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
39 020 |
43 356 |
78 040 |
45 000 |
80 000 |
|
|
6 Rel-9 |
R.3-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
39 020 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test6) |
43 356 |
78 040 |
45 000 |
80 000 |
|
7 |
R.3 (10 MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
1 366 |
1 518 |
2 732 |
3 000 |
4 000 |
|
R.3-1 (5 MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU70 |
1 366 |
1 518 |
2 732 |
3 000 |
4 000 |
|
|
7 Rel-9 |
R.3-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU70 |
1 366 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test7) |
1 518 |
2 732 |
3 000 |
4 000 |
|
8 |
R.3 (10 MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 High) ETU,300 |
3 189 |
3 544 |
6 378 |
5 000 |
8 000 |
|
R.3-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 High) ETU300 |
3 189 |
3 544 |
6 378 |
5 000 |
8 000 |
|
|
8 Rel-9 |
R.3-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 High) ETU300 |
3 189 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test8) |
3 544 |
6 378 |
5 000 |
8 000 |
|
9 |
R.5 (3 MHz, full, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
50 000 |
55 556 |
100 000 |
57 000 |
101 000 |
|
10 |
R.6 (5 MHz, full, 64QAM, 3/4) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
48 847 |
54 275 |
97 694 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
10 Rel-9 |
R.6-1 (5MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
48 847 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test10) |
54 275 |
97 694 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
11 |
R.7 (10 MHz, full, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
46 524 |
51 694 |
93 048 |
53 000 |
95 000 |
|
11 Rel-9 |
R.7-1 (10MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
46 524 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test11) |
51 694 |
93 048 |
53 000 |
95 000 |
|
12 |
R.7 (10 MHz, full, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
4 722 |
5 247 |
9 444 |
7 000 |
11 000 |
|
12 Rel-9 |
R.7-1 (10MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) ETU70 |
4 722 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test12) |
5 247 |
9 444 |
7 000 |
11 000 |
|
13 |
R.7 (10 MHz, full, 64 QAM, 3/4) (1x2High) EVA,5 |
100 000 |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
|
13 Rel-9 |
R.7-1 (10MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 High) EVA5 |
100 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test13) |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
|
14 |
R.8 (15 MHz, full, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
48 434 |
53 816 |
96 868 |
55 000 |
98 000 |
|
14 Rel-9 |
R.8-1 (15MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
48 434 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test14) |
53 816 |
96 868 |
55 000 |
98 000 |
|
15 |
R.9 (20 MHz, full, 64QAM,3/4) (1×2 Low) EVA,5 |
100 000 |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
|
15 Rel-9 |
R.9-1 (20MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
100 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test15) |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
|
15 Rel-9 |
R.9-2 (20MHz, partial, 64QAM, ¾) (1×2 Low) EVA5 |
100 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-1 Test15) |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
|
16 |
R.0 (3 MHz, 1PRB,16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
5 710 |
6 345 |
11 420 |
8 000 |
13 000 |
|
17 |
R.1 (10MHz,1PRB,16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
9 234 |
10 260 |
18 468 |
12 000 |
20 000 |
|
18 |
R.1 (20MHz,1PRB,16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 |
13 373 |
14 859 |
26 746 |
16 000 |
28 000 |
+1000Table G.3.5-2: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single Antenna Port Performance with 1 PRB
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.29 (10MHz,1PRB,16QAM,½) (1×2 Low) ETU,70 [MBSFN] |
5 246 |
17 487 |
17 487 |
19 000 |
19 000 |
Table G.3.5-3: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit diversity 2×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Med) EVA,5 [SFBC, Space Frequency Block Code] |
50 000 |
55 556 |
100 000 |
57 000 |
101 000 |
|
R.11-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Med) EVA5 [SFBC, Space Frequency Block Code] |
50 000 |
55 556 |
100 000 |
57 000 |
101 000 |
|
|
1 Rel-9 |
R.11-2 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Med) EVA5 [SFBC] |
50 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) |
55 556 |
100 000 |
57 000 |
101 000 |
|
2 |
R.10 (10MHz, Full, QPSK, 1/3) (2×2) HST [SFBC] |
28 800 |
NA |
NA |
28 800 |
57 600 |
Table G.3.5-3a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit diversity 2×2 for eICIC
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-4 (10MHz, full, QPSK, ½) (2×2 Med) EVA,5 [SFBC, Space Frequency Block Code] |
50 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) |
224 000 |
501 000 |
Table G.3.5-3b: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit diversity 2×2 for feICIC
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-4 (10MHz, full, QPSK, ½) (2×2 Med) EVA,5 [SFBC, Space Frequency Block Code] |
50 000 MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-3 Test1 |
224 000 |
501 000 |
Table G.3.5-4: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit diversity 4×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.12 (1.4MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (4×2 med) EPA,5 [SFBC-FSTD, SFBC-Frequency Shifted Transmit Diversity] |
150 000 |
166 667 |
300 000 |
168 000 |
301 000 |
|
1 Rel-9 |
R.13 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (4×2 Low) ETU70 [SFBC-FSTD] |
10 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-4 Test1) |
11 112 |
20 000 |
13 000 |
21 000 |
Table G.3.5-5: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Spacial Multiplexing 2×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 FDD |
R.11 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA70 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 |
8 445 |
– |
10 000 |
– |
|
1 TDD |
R.11-1 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA70 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 |
– |
19 000 |
– |
20 000 |
|
2 |
R.11-2 (5MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA,70 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 (MNAS is not simulated, just follow the similar 10MHz test scenario in Test 1) |
8 445 |
– |
10 000 |
– |
Table G.3.5-5a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Spacial Multiplexing 2×2 for eICIC
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity, Non-MBSFN ABS] |
7 600 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-5 Test1) |
35 000 |
77 000 |
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity, MBSFN ABS] |
7 600 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) |
77 000 |
77 000 |
Table G.3.5-5b: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Spacial Multiplexing 2×2 for feICIC
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-5 Test1 |
35 000 |
77 000 |
|
2 |
R.35 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenario in Table G.3.5-5 Test1 |
35 000 |
77 000 |
Table G.3.5-6: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Spacial Multiplexing 4×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.14 (10MHz, full, 16 QAM, ½) (4×2 low) EVA,70 [LD-CDD] |
4 860 |
5 400 |
12 150 |
7 000 |
14 000 |
Table G.3.5-7: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed LoopSingle/Multilayer Spacial Multiplexing 2×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.10 (10MHz, Full, QPSK,1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA5 [SCW, Single CodeWord] |
49 140 |
54 600 |
98 280 |
56 000 |
100 000 |
|
1A |
R.10-2 (5MHz, Full, QPSK,1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA5 [SCW, Single CodeWord] |
49 140 |
54 600 |
98 280 |
56 000 |
100 000 |
|
2 |
R.10 (10MHz, Full, QPSK, 1/3) (2×2 High) EPA5 [SCW] |
50 000 |
55 556 |
100 000 |
57 000 |
101 000 |
|
3 FDD |
R.11 (10MHz,full, 16QAM, ½) (2x2Low) EVA5 [MCW, Multiple Code Word] |
34 266 |
38 074 |
– |
40 000 |
– |
|
3 TDD |
R.11-1 (10MHz,full, 16QAM, ½) (2x2Low) EVA5 [MCW, Multiple Code Word] |
34 266 |
– |
85 665 |
– |
87 000 |
|
3 Rel-9 |
R.35 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, ½) (2×2 Low) EPA5 [MCW] |
48 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-12 Test5) |
53 333 |
120 000 |
55 000 |
121 000 |
|
4 FDD |
R.11 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2x2Low) ETU70 [MCW] |
2 736 |
3 040 |
– |
5 000 |
– |
|
4 TDD |
R.11-1 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2x2Low) ETU70 [MCW] |
2 736 |
– |
6840 |
– |
8000 |
|
4A |
R.11-2 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2x2Low) ETU70 [MCW] |
2 736 |
3 040 |
– |
5 000 |
– |
Table G.3.5-8: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Single/Multilayer Spacial Multiplexing 4×2
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.13 (10 MHz, Full, QPSK, 1/3) (4×2 Low) EVA,5 [SCW] |
26 528 |
29 476 |
53 056 |
31 000 |
55 000 |
|
2 |
R.14 (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (4x2low) EVA5 [MCW] |
26 066 |
28 963 |
65 165 |
30 000 |
67 000 |
|
2 Rel-9 |
R.36 (10MHz, full, 64QAM 1/2) (4×2 Low) EPA5 |
30 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-4 Test1) |
33 333 |
75 000 |
35 000 |
76 000 |
Table G.3.5-9: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 8 and forward)
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.25 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (1×2 Low) EPA,5 |
38 879 |
43 199 |
77 758 |
45 000 |
79 000 |
|
2 |
R.26 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) EPA5 |
47 781 |
53 090 |
95 562 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
|
3 |
R.27 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 3/4) (1×2 Low) EPA,5 |
48 685 |
54 095 |
97 370 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
4 |
R.28 (10MHz, 1PRB, 16QAM, ½) (1×2 Low) EPA,5 |
100 000 |
111 112 |
200 000 |
113 000 |
201 000 |
Table G.3.5-10: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 9 and forward)
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 NA |
||||
|
2 |
R.26-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM ½) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
|
3 |
R.27-1 (10MHz, part, 64QAM 3/4) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
4 NA |
||||
Table G.3.5-11: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without simultaneous transmission
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.31 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 1 |
45 000 |
79 000 |
|
2 |
R.32 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Medium) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
|
R.32-1 (5MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Medium) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, channel BW, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
|||
|
3 |
R.33 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 3/4) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
R.33-1 (10MHz, part, 64QAM, 3/4) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, allocation, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
|||
Table G.3.5-12: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
4 |
R.32 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Medium) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
|
5 |
R.34 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-12a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.43 FDD, R50 TDD (10 MHz, full, QSPK, 1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, propagation condition, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 1 |
45 000 |
79 000 |
Table G.3.5-12b: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
2 |
R.50 FDD, R.44 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-12c: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing for FeICIC
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 FDD, R11 TDD (10 MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (2×2 High) EPA, 5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, propagation condition, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 1 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
Table G.3.5-13: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.31 (10 MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 1 |
[45 000] |
[79 000] |
|
2 |
R.32 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Medium) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
[55 000] |
[97 000] |
Table G.3.5-13a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing for eDL-MIMO
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.51 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
Table G.3.5-14: Minimum Test time for PDSCH transmit Diversity 2×2 with TM3 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type A
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.46 (10MHz, full, QPSK, 1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA70 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA70 or ETU70 propagation conditions |
15 000 |
27 000 |
Table G.3.5-15: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Single Layer Spatial Multiplexing 2×2 with TM4 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type A
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.47 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/3) (2×2 Low) EVA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 or ETU70 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
100 000 |
Table G.3.5-16: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type A
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.48 (10MHz, full, QPSK, 1/2) (4×2 Low) EVA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 propagation conditions |
57 000 |
101 000 |
Table G.3.5-17: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Single layer Spacial Multiplexing 2×1 for UE Category 0
|
Clause 8.9.1.1.2/8.9.1.2.2 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.63 (10MHz, 1PRB, 64QAM, ½) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
48 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-7 Test3 Rel-9) with HD-FDD pattern |
142 222 |
120 000 |
144 000 |
121 000 |
Table G.3.5-17a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Single layer Spacial Multiplexing 2×1 for UE Category M1
|
Clause 8.11.1.1.1/8.11.1.2.1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.79] (10MHz, 1PRB, 16QAM, ½) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
48 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-7 Test3 Rel-9) with HD-FDD pattern |
240 000 |
120 000 |
241 000 |
121 000 |
Table G.3.5-18: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing 2×2– Enhanced Performance Type C
|
Clause 8.2.1.3.1B/8.2.2.3.1B Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 FDD R.11-1 TDD (10MHz, Full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Medium) EVA70 [LD-CDD, Large Delay-Cyclic Delay Diversity] |
7 600 (MNAS is not simulated, just follow the similar 10MHz test scenario in Table G.3.5-5 Test 1 FDD) |
10 000 |
20 000 |
Table G.3.5-19: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing 2×2– Enhanced Performance Type C
|
Clause 8.2.1.4.2A/8.2.2.4.2A Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 FDD R.11-1 TDD (10MHz, full, 16QAM, ½) (2×2 Medium) ETU70 [MCW] |
2 736 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-7 Test4 FDD) |
5 000 |
8 000 |
Table G.3.5-20: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Open Loop Single/Multilayer Spatial Multiplexing 2×2 with TM1 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type C
|
Clause 8.2.1.3.1C/8.2.2.3.1C Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-8 FDD R.11-10 TDD (10MHz, full, QPSK, 3/5, 1/2) (2×2 Medium) EVA70 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA70 or ETU70 propagation conditions |
15 000 |
26 000 |
Table G.3.5-21: Minimum Test time for for CDM-multiplexed DM RS – Enhanced Performance Type C
|
Clause 8.3.1.2.2/8.3.2.2.2 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.51 FDD R.32 TDD (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Medium) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
[55 000] |
[97 000] |
Table G.3.5-22: Minimum Test time for PDSCH transmit Diversity 2×2 with TM2 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type B
|
Clause 8.2.1.2.5 / 8.2.2.2.6 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-10 FDD R.11-12 TDD (10MHz, full, QPSK, 0.67 FDD, 0.54-0.66 TDD) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
48000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
60 000 |
120 000 |
Table G.3.5-23: Minimum Test time for PDSCH transmit Diversity 2×2 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type B
|
Clause 8.2.1.2.6 / 8.2.2.2.7 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-9 FDD R.11-11 TDD (10MHz, full, QPSK, 0.58 FDD, 0.48-0.58 TDD) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
48000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
60 000 |
120 000 |
Table G.3.5-24: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Performance with DCI format 2D, non Quasi Co-located Antenna Ports, Same Cell ID and single NZP CSI-RS resource for CoMP
|
Clause 8.3.1.3.1_F/ 8.3.2.4.1_F Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.52 FDD R.52 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
2 |
R.52 FDD R.52 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-25: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Performance with DCI format 2D, non Quasi Co-located Antenna Ports, Same Cell ID and multiple NZP CSI-RS resources for CoMP
|
Clause 8.3.1.3.2_F/ 8.3.2.4.2_F Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.53 FDD R.53 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
|
2 |
R.53 FDD R.53 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-26: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Performance with DCI format 2D, non Quasi Co-located Antenna Ports, Different Cell ID, Colliding CRS and single NZP CSI-RS resource for CoMP
|
Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.54 FDD R.54 TDD (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA,5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC number, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 2 |
55 000 |
97 000 |
Table G.3.5-27: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Single Layer Spatial Multiplexing 2×2 with TM4 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type B
|
Clause 8.2.1.4.4 / 8.2.2.4.5 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11-10 FDD R.11-12 TDD (10MHz, full, QPSK, 0.67 FDD, 0.54-0.66 TDD) (2×2 Low) EVA5 |
48000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 propagation conditions |
60 000 |
120 000 |
|
2 |
R.11-9 FDD R.11-11 TDD (10MHz, full, QPSK, 0.58 FDD, 0.48-0.58 TDD) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
48000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
60 000 |
120 000 |
Table G.3.5-28: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit Diversity for UE Category 0
|
Clause 8.9.1.1.1/8.9.1.2.1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.62 (10MHz, 16QAM, ½) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) with HD-FDD pattern |
133 333 |
125 000 |
145 000 |
126 000 |
Table G.3.5-28a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit Diversity for UE Category M1
|
Clause 8.11.1.1.3.1/8.11.1.1.3.1_1/ 8.11.1.2.3.1/8.11.1.2.3.1_1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.81 (10MHz, QPSK, 1/10) (2×1 Low) ETU1 |
194 560 (MNAS is not simulated but based on Table G.4.4-1) |
486 400 |
1 167 360 |
488 000 |
1 169 000 |
|
2 |
R.79 (10MHz, 16QAM, ½) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
48 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-9 Test2) with HD-FDD pattern |
240 000 |
120 000 |
241 000 |
121 000 |
Table G.3.5-28b: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit Diversity for UE Category M2
|
Clause 8.11.1.1.3.2/8.11.1.1.3.2_1/ 8.11.1.2.3.2/8.11.1.2.3.2_1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.90 (10MHz, QPSK, 1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
(38 879 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-9 Test1) with HD-FDD pattern |
1 244 128 |
3 110 320 |
1 246 000 |
3 112 000 |
|
2 |
R.91 (10MHz, QPSK, 1/10, 2×1 Low, ETU1) |
(MNAS is not simulated but based on Table G.4.4-1) |
389 120 |
778 240 |
391 000 |
780 000 |
Table G.3.5-29: Minimum Test time for Closed Loop spatial multiplexing, 4 Layers spatial multiplexing with 4 Tx ports and 4 Rx ports
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.8/ 8.10.1.2.8 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.74 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (4×4 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
168 000 |
301 000 |
Table G.3.5-30: Minimum Test time for 4 Layer Spatial Multiplexing for 4 Rx (User-Specific Reference Symbols)
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.9/ 8.10.1.2.9 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.75 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/2) (4×4 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-31: Minimum Test time for Open Loop spatial multiplexing, 3 Layers with 4 Tx ports and 4 Rx ports
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.7/ 8.10.1.2.7 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.73 (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 0.43) (4×4 Low) EVA70 |
4 860 Note: MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on the similar scenario in Table G.3.5-6 Test1 |
7 000 |
14 000 |
Table G.3.5-32: Minimum Test time for 4-Rx PDSCH Closed Loop Single Layer Spatial Multiplexing 2×4 with TM4 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type A
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.3/8.10.1.2.3 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.47 (10MHz, full, 16QAM, 1/3) (2×4 Low) EVA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 or ETU70 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
100 000 |
Table G.3.5A-33: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 for UE category 0
|
Clause 8.9.1.1.3/8.9.1.2.3 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.64 (10 MHz, 6l, QPSK, 1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA,5 |
38 879 (MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-9 Test 1) with HD-FDD pattern |
115 197 |
97 198 |
117 000 |
99 000 |
Table G.3.5-33a: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 for UE category M1
|
Clause 8.11.1.1.2/8.11.1.2.2 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.80 (10 MHz, 6l, QPSK, 1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA,5 |
38 879 (MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-9 Test 1) with HD-FDD pattern |
1 244 128 |
2 138 345 |
1 246 000 |
2 140 000 |
Table G.3.5-33b: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 for UE category 1bis
|
Clause 8.9.1.1.3_1/8.9.1.2.3_1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
2 |
R.86 (10MHz, 16QAM, 1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) with HD-FDD pattern |
133 333 |
125 000 |
145 000 |
126 000 |
Table G.3.5-34: Minimum Test time for 4-Rx PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Type A
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.5 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.76 (10MHz, full, QPSK,) (2×4 Low) EVA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
100 000 |
Table G.3.5-35: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Closed Loop Multi-layer Spatial Multiplexing 2×2 for 256QAM in DL
|
Clause 8.2.1.4.1_H/ 8.2.2.4.1_H Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
3 |
R.65 FDD (10MHz, full, 256QAM,) (2×2 Low) EVA5 R.65 TDD (20MHz, full, 256QAM,) (2×2 Low) EVA5 |
50 000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 propagation conditions |
63 000 |
125 000 |
Table G.3.5-36: PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 without simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO for 256QAM in DL
|
Clause 8.3.1.1.1_H /8.3.2.1.2_H Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
3 |
R.66 FDD (10MHz, full, 256QAM,) (2×2 Low) EPA5 R.66 TDD (20MHz, full, 256QAM,) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
63 000 |
125 000 |
Table G.3.5-37: PDSCH Transmit Diversity 2×4
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.1 /8.10.1.2.1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, full, 16QAM,) (2×4 Medium correlation A) EVA5 |
50 000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA5 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
100 000 |
Table G.3.5-38: PDSCH Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing 2×4
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.2 /8.10.1.2.2 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.11 (10MHz, full, 16QAM,) (2×4 Low) EVA70 |
7600 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EVA70 propagation conditions |
10 000 |
17 000 |
Table G.3.5-39: PDSCH Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing 2×4
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.4 /8.10.1.2.4 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.36 (10MHz, full, 64QAM,) (4×4 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
56000 |
126 000 |
|
2 |
R.72 (10MHz, full, 256QAM,) (4×4 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
56000 |
126 000 |
Table G.3.5-40: Dual-Layer Spatial Multiplexing 2×4 (User-Specific Reference Symbols)
|
Clause 8.10.1.1.6 /8.10.1.2.6 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.51 (10MHz, full, 16QAM,) (2×4 Low) ETU5 |
50000 Note: MNAS is not simulated. It is estimated based on other similar test cases using EPA5 propagation conditions |
56 000 |
100 000 |
Table G.3.5-41: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Transmit Diversity for UE Category 1bis
|
Clause 8.9.1.1.1_1/8.9.1.2.1_1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNS (Calculation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
||
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
2 |
R.84 (10MHz, 16QAM, ½) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
50 000 (MNAS is not simulated, but estimated based on similar scenarios in Table G.3.5-3 Test1) with HD-FDD pattern |
133 333 |
125 000 |
145 000 |
126 000 |
Table G.3.5-42: Minimum Test time for PDSCH for UE Category NB1
|
Clause 8.12.1.1.2 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.NB.3 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/2) (1×1) EPA5 |
3609 |
3466000 |
N/A |
|
2 |
R.NB.3 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/2) (1×1) ETU1 |
3609 |
5544000 |
N/A |
Table G.3.5-43: Minimum Test time for PDSCH for UE Category NB1
|
Clause 8.12.1.1.1 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.NB.5 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
3040 |
99000 |
N/A |
|
2 |
R.NB.5 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/3) (2×1 Low) EPA5 |
97280 |
293000 |
|
|
3 |
R.NB.5-1 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/3) (2×1 Low) ETU1 |
778240 |
1752000 |
N/A |
Table G.3.5-44: Minimum Test time for PDSCH for UE Category NB2
|
Clause 8.12.1.1.3 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
HD-FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.NB.7 FDD (200kHz, QPSK,1/2) (1×1) EPA5 |
3609 |
44000 |
N/A |
Table G.3.5-45: Minimum Test time for PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing for FD-MIMO
|
Clause 8.3.1.1.9/8.3.2.1.10 Test No |
Demodulation scenario (info only) |
MNAS (Simulation) |
MNSF (Min No Sub Frames, mandatory) |
|
|
FDD |
TDD |
|||
|
1 |
R.50 FDD, R.44 TDD (10MHz, full, 64QAM, 1/2) (2×2 Low) EPA5 |
Note: MNAS is not simulated. Because of same demodulation scenario except for RMC, target coding rate, antenna configuration, MNSF is reused from Table G.3.5-9, Test 3 |
56 000 |
99 000 |
G.3.6 Test conditions for receiver performance tests
Table G.3.6: Test conditions for receiver performance tests
Table G.3.6-1: Single Antenna Port Performance (Cell-specific Reference Symbols) for test case 8.2.1.1 and 8.2.2.1 demodulation of PDSCH
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.2.1.1 FDD PDSCH Single Antenna Port Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.2.1.1 and 8.2.2.1each component in the test vector must pass For UEs, supporting multiple E_UTRA-bands (number of bands =B), the number of repetitions must be multiplied by B. If a test is defined over a BW>(BW of the E_UTRA band), the test is not applicable and reduces the number of repetitions. If a test is defined over a BW, which is not supported in the E_UTRAN band, the test is not applicable and reduces the number of repetitions. |
|
QPSK |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|||
|
16QAM |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
8.2.1.2 TDD PDSCH Single Antenna Port Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
64 QAM |
1 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
1PRB |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||
|
Σ |
10 |
18 |
19 |
|||
Table G.3.6-2: Transmit Diversity Performance (Cell-specific Reference Symbols) for test case 8.2.1.2 and 8.2.2.2 demodulation of PDSCH
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.2.1.2 FDD PDSCH Transmit Diversity Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.2.1.2 and 8.2.2.2 each component in the test vector must pass For UEs, supporting multiple E_UTRA-bands (number of bands =B), the number of repetitions must be multiplied by B. If a test is defined over a BW, which is not supported in the E_UTRAN band, the test is not applicable and reduces the number of repetitions. |
|
QPSK |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
8.2.2.2 TDD PDSCH Transmit Diversity Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
16QAM |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Σ |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|||
Table G.3.6-3: Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-specific Reference Symbols) for test case 8.2.1.3 and 8.2.2.3 demodulation of PDSCH
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.2.1.3 FDD PDSCH Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.2.1.3 and 8.2.2.3 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
16QAM |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
8.2.2.3 TDD PDSCH Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
Σ |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
Table G.3.6-4: Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-specific Reference Symbols) for test case 8.2.1.4 and 8.2.2.4 demodulation of PDSCH
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.2.1.4 FDD PDSCH Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.2.1.4 and 8.2.2.4 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
Single layer QPSK |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||
|
8.2.2.4 TDD PDSCH Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing Performance (Cell-Specific Reference Symbols) |
subframes are independent |
Multi layer 16QAM |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
Σ |
3 |
6 |
6 |
|||
Table G.3.6-5: TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 8 and forward)
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.2.1.1 TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 8 and forward) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.3.2.1 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
QPSK |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
16QAM |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
64 QAM |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Σ |
2 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Table G.3.6-6: TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 9 and forward)
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.2.1.1_1 TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 5 (Release 9 and forward) |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.3.2.1.1_1 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
16QAM |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|||
|
64 QAM |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|||
|
Σ |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Table G.3.6-7: TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without a simultaneous transmission
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.2.1.2 TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without a simultaneous transmission |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2-5 |
To pass 8.3.2.1.2 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
|
QPSK |
1 |
1 |
||||
|
16QAM |
1 |
1 |
||||
|
64 QAM |
1 |
1 |
||||
|
Σ |
3 |
3 |
||||
Table G.3.6-8: TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.2.1.3 TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2-5 |
To pass 8.3.2.1.3 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
|
16QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||
|
64 QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||
|
Σ |
0 |
2 |
||||
Table G.3.6-8a: PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without a simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||||||
|
8.3.1.1.1_D FDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without a simultaneous transmission |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1-8 |
To pass 8.3.1.1.1_D and 8.3.2.1.2_D each component in the test vector must pass |
||||||
|
QPSK |
1 |
|||||||||
|
8.3.2.1.2_D TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 without a simultaneous transmission |
subframes are independent |
QPSK |
1 |
|||||||
|
Σ |
2 |
|||||||||
Table G.3.6-8b: PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||||||
|
8.3.1.1.2_D FDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2-8 |
To pass 8.3.1.1.2_D and 8.3.2.1.3_D each component in the test vector must pass |
|||||
|
64QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||||||
|
8.3.2.1.3_D TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna port 7 or 8 with a simultaneous transmission for eDL-MIMO |
subframes are independent |
64QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||||
|
Σ |
0 |
2 |
||||||||
Table G.3.6-8c: PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Requirement Type A
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.1.1.3 FDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Requirement Type A |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1-8 |
To pass 8.3.1.1.3 and 8.3.2.1.4 each component in the test vector must pass |
||
|
QPSK |
1 |
|||||
|
8.3.2.1.4 TDD PDSCH Single-layer Spatial Multiplexing on antenna ports 7 or 8 with TM9 Interference Model – Enhanced Performance Requirement Type A |
subframes are independent |
QPSK |
1 |
|||
|
Σ |
2 |
|||||
Table G.3.6-9: TDD PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||
|
8.3.2.2.1 TDD PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2 |
3-5 |
To pass 8.3.2.2.1 each component in the test vector must pass |
|
QPSK |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
16QAM |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|||
|
64 QAM |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|||
|
Σ |
2 |
4 |
4 |
|||
Table G.3.6-9a: PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing for eDL-MIMO
|
Test |
Statistical independence |
Number of components in the test vector, as specified in the test requirements and initial conditions of the applicable test |
Over all Pass/Fail condition |
|||||||
|
8.3.1.2.1_D FDD PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing for eDL-MIMO |
subframes are independent |
CAT |
1 |
2-8 |
To pass 8.3.1.2.1_D and 8.3.2.2.1_D each component in the test vector must pass |
|||||
|
16QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||||||
|
8.3.2.2.1_D TDD PDSCH Dual-layer Spatial Multiplexing for eDL-MIMO |
subframes are independent |
16QAM |
0 |
1 |
||||||
|
Σ |
0 |
2 |
||||||||