M.4.2 TRP Integration for Constant Step Size Grid Type

38.521-23GPPNRPart 2: Range 2 StandaloneRadio transmission and receptionRelease 17TSUser Equipment (UE) conformance specification

Different approaches to perform the TRP integration from the respective EIRP measurements are outlined in the next sub clauses for the constant step size grid type.

M.4.2.1 TRP Integration using Weights

In many engineering disciplines, the integral of a function needs to be solved using numerical integration techniques, commonly referred to as “quadrature”. Here, the approximation of the integral of a function is usually stated as a weighted sum of function values at specified points within the domain of integration. The derivation from the closed surface TRP integral

to the classical discretized summation equation used for OTA

The weights for this integral are based on the sin⋅ weights. More accurate implementations are based on the Clenshaw-Curtis quadrature integral approximation based on an expansion of the integrand in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. This implementation does not ignore the measurement points at the poles (=0o and 180o) where sin = 0. The discretized TRP can be expressed as

which the sin⋅ weights replaced by a weight function W( and extends the sum over I to include the poles There is no simple closed-form expression for the Clenshaw-Curtis weights; however, a numerical straightforward approach is available, i.e.,

with

and

The Clenshaw-Curtis weights are compared to the classical sin ⋅ weights in Tables M.4.2.1-1 and M.4.2.1-2 for two different numbers of latitudes. The TRP measurement grid consists of N+1 latitudes and M longitudes with

and

Table M.4.2.1-1: Samples and weights for the classical sin ⋅ weighting and Clenshaw-Curtis quadratures with 12 latitudes (=16.4o)

Classical sin

Clenshaw-Curtis

 [deg]

Weights

 [deg]

Weights

0

0

0

0.008

16.4

0.08

16.4

0.079

32.7

0.154

32.7

0.155

49.1

0.216

49.1

0.216

65.5

0.26

65.5

0.26

81.8

0.283

81.8

0.283

98.2

0.283

98.2

0.283

114.6

0.26

114.6

0.26

130.9

0.216

130.9

0.216

147.3

0.154

147.3

0.155

163.6

0.08

163.6

0.079

180

0

180

0.008

Table M.4.2.1-2: Samples and weights for the classical sin ⋅ weighting and Clenshaw-Curtis quadratures with 13 latitudes (=15o)

Classical sin

Clenshaw-Curtis

 [deg]

Weights

 [deg]

Weights

0

0

0

0.007

15

0.0678

15

0.0661

30

0.1309

30

0.1315

45

0.1851

45

0.1848

60

0.2267

60

0.227

75

0.2529

75

0.2527

90

0.2618

90

0.262

105

0.2529

105

0.2527

120

0.2267

120

0.227

135

0.1851

135

0.1848

150

0.1309

150

0.1315

165

0.0678

165

0.0661

180

0

180

0.007